Effect of Sequestration on the NIH

The question most immediately on the mind of everyone submitting grants in 2012 for FY13 is the impact of the Budget Control Act of 2011 on NIH paylines. With an election in November, a looming debt ceiling (possibly before the election but likely after – but no later than Dec-Jan), and automatic sequestration (7.8% cut to all non-defense discretionary programs) to kick in on Jan 2, 2013, it does not look good. Relief would only come if Congress passes bipartisan balanced deficit reduction legislation in time …

With all these unknowns, none of them good, the interim paylines will be very conservative. In a letter to Rep. Edward Markey (D, Mass), the Asst Secretary for Financial Resources at HHS estimates that the NIH

“could potentially eliminate 2,300 new and competiting research project grants, with nearly 300 fewer grants by the National Cancer Institute.”

In FY11, the NIH funded 8,776 Type 1, 2, & 3 research project grant applications, so we would be looking at more than 25% fewer awards. At NCI, 1480 competing RPGs were funded in FY11, so cutting 300 awards would represent a 20% drop. I assume the cuts to other mechanisms would be proportional … or the ICs might shuffle funds around to protect R01s at the expense of other mechanisms.

Now, the FY will begin with a continuing resolution, most likely based on FY12 funding levels, but this is not required (that is, Congress could go back to an earlier FY to set interim budget authority). Even though they may start out at FY12 budget levels, the ICs won’t know if these will precipitously drop come January, so will almost certainly not be making awards according to FY12 paylines. Your PO won’t know either, so there is no use in asking until the fiscal picture in DC becomes more clear.

In the meantime, don’t hesitate to remind your Congressional delegation (and candidates for office) of the importance of sustained funding for scientific research in support of the physical, mental, and economic health of the nation. The FASEB Legislative Action Center offers excellent tools to help you contact the right folks and make the right points.

5 Comments »

  1. SG said

    Ouch! Not to mention 10-12% cuts in the budgets for noncompetitive renewals.

  2. […] (who knows where they find get jobs) … bad news for ICs who may therefore need to shift the burden of sequestration to RPGs or other […]

  3. […] of federal budgets, effective Jan. 2, 2013. Most non-defense budgets, including NIH, could be cut by nearly 8%. That would slide us back to about the middle of the doubling era and could mean 20 to 25% fewer […]

  4. […] 이제 미국 예산 강제삭감으로 연구비가 하루아침에 거의 10% 이상 줄어드는 …에서 아마 전반적으로 돈 많이 쓰는 거대과학 프로젝트에 대해서는 아마 […]

  5. Jennifer said

    There’s still time to prevent sequestration—but we must act now. Sign our prefilled letters to the senators and the house. http://owl.li/e8lVs

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: