Surveying Peer Review Enhancements

In the midst of grant deadlines, writedit has been staring longingly at the psychiatric hospital up the hill, where a room with a view and a valium drip sounds good about now, but has just enough time for a quick post to distract all of you with freshly assigned impact scores from obsessively searching for any hint of funding success … and those of you with stale impact scores from wondering again when paylines might be known.

The NIGMS Feedback Loop and Rock Talk both have current posts on OER survey data on Enhancing Peer Review. The Feedback Loop pulls out respondent assessment of the value of the individual criterion scores, a topic of recent interest to Director Berg both at the NIGMS and NIH-wide level. Seems less than half of you feel the criterion scores are particularly helpful …

1 Comment »

  1. SG said

    All that work “enhancing peer review” and the survey said…..

    “eh” (shoulder shrug).

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: