No Need for Research of Nicotine in Pregnancy?

This post has been modified in recognition of reports that this center proposal is no longer under consideration for funding by Philip Morris; discussion of the questionable request has been removed, though issues related to research on the safety of nicotine use during pregnancy have been left for reference purposes. In August 2008, a Richmond paper reported on a proposal by the dean of the VCU School of Medicine (Jerome F. Strauss, III, MD, PhD) for a Center for Healthy Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes submitted to Philip Morris for up to $30M in funding. Although the proposal was turned down, of lingering concern is Strauss’s statement that

“Research shows that nicotine entering the bloodstream of pregnant women enrolled in smoking-cessation programs improves the health of their unborn children.”

This remarkable claim aside, there remains the dilemma of what to do with moms-to-be who can’t or won’t go cold turkey on smoking cessation. The most recent published data available are from an open-label randomized clinical trial showing that while nicotine replacement products help maintain smoking cessation during pregnancy, they do not promote permanent cessation, and the long-term effects of nicotine exposure on the fetus remain unknown. Unfortunately, this trial was stopped early by its DSMB when too many negative birth outcomes occurred among the group of women using nicotine replacement therapy. Three prior clinical trials conducted in Denmark (two studies) and Canada were inconclusive at best (Canadian study was stopped early as well), and a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial is underway in the UK. [oddly, Kranzler, cited in the Richmond story, has not yet published the claims he makes to Dovi and only has one review article on the topic from 2003]

The NICHD is funding a cooperative clinical research program (U10HD036104) in minority women specifically addressing “the risk of nicotine exposure to the fetus and during infancy, … [along] a continuum impacting both health and development in later life.” Perfect. The U10 award is in its tenth year, so stay tuned for results from the George Washington University Medical Center.

Although he adamently told the media that the center at the heart of the Philip Morris request would not involve any research nor publish any findings, Strauss appears to be too overcommitted to rework his proposal for a research-oriented sponsor given that he serves as as Dean of the VCU School of Medicine; as Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs for the VCU Health System; and as PI for:



  1. VJ Sleight said

    This is just another example of how truely evil the tobacco companies can be but twisting informatin around to make themselves look like the “good guys”. No one who smokes is healthy and pregnant women expose their unborn child to a host of complications if they continue to smoke during pregnancy. Rather that encouraging the use of medicinal products to quit, more research should be done on what can be done to help them abstain during pregnancy and after delivery since exposure to secondhand smoke is very damaging to newborns as well. For free quitting tips visit:
    VJ Sleight, Queen of Quitting, a former smoker, cancer thrivor, and Tobacco Treatment Specialist.

  2. […] public links >> medicine No Need for Research of Nicotine in Pregnancy? Saved by Severum on Thu 25-9-2008 Radio Waves and Medicine: Cure or Witches Brew? Part 3 Saved by […]

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: