DoD S&T Initiatives

The proposed DoD Science & Technology FY08 budget of $10.8 billion is 2.2% of the total DoD budget, a decline of $311 million (whereas total DoD budget grew by $42 billion in FY08). This is about a third of the NIH budget, but it’s spent on significantly fewer initiatives (I like the 3rd category – perhaps the vomit flashlight?):

Foundational Sciences – $300-500M
Active & Conventional Armor Technology – $50M
Defeat of Speed of Light Weapons Systems – $50-100M
Adaptive, Interactive, Full Immersion Training of the Soldier/Marine – $50-100M
Metamaterials – $30-50M
Information Warfare – $100-200M
Information Assurance – $100-200M
Networking Technology – $40-70M
Organization, Fusion, & Mining Large Data Sets for Enhanced Decision Making – $40-60M
Energy – $50-100M
Manufacturing Science Technology – $50-70M
Software Development Technology – $40-70M
Combatting Weapons of Mass Destruction – $50-100M
Neuro-ergonomics – $30-50M
Advanced Medical Research – $100-150M
Autonomous Operations of Networks of Unmanned Vehicles in Complex Environments – $100M
Disparate Sensors, Communications, & Spectrum Management – $500M
Biometric-Based Tactical Threat Identification Demonstration – $190M
Monitoring the Marine Environment for Marine Mammals During Active Sonar Operations – $150M
Specialty Materials for Airships – $30M

Given the crowd who probably reads this blog, I’ll add that the Advanced Medical Research initiative includes such topics as … tissue regeneration, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder … [okay, all these make sense] … and …

“Off-head neurophysiologically-based brain activity sensing” [I get the gist – but there must be a better title] and
“Universal Antigens” [hmmm]

And yes, I realize these don’t add up to $10.8B. These are the major priorities – there will be others, and demonstration projects as well. UPDATE: Science is reporting a request to increase the S&T budget by 11% (1.2B) for FY09, though the likelihood of such an increase is slim. Additional resources would go primarily toward “foundational sciences, covering areas such as biosensors, photonic crystals, and the computing sciences.”

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. Optik said

    Where did you get these numbers from? Could you please point us to some official documents regarding those figures. Thanks.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: