<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Medical Writing, Editing &amp; Grantsmanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writedit.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Customized Customer Support for Biomedical Researchers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Perceptions of Science &#8211; Scientist vs Public by microfool</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/perceptions-of-science-scientist-vs-public/#comment-5437</link>
		<dc:creator>microfool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2362#comment-5437</guid>
		<description>Are the demographics of AAAS representative of scientists in general?
http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1554</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the demographics of AAAS representative of scientists in general?<br />
<a href="http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1554" rel="nofollow">http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1554</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perceptions of Science &#8211; Scientist vs Public by whimple</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/perceptions-of-science-scientist-vs-public/#comment-5436</link>
		<dc:creator>whimple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2362#comment-5436</guid>
		<description>Interesting that 72% of scientists are male.  Worst confusion among the public is that antibiotics work on viruses.  Not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that 72% of scientists are male.  Worst confusion among the public is that antibiotics work on viruses.  Not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perceptions of Science &#8211; Scientist vs Public by biochem belle</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/perceptions-of-science-scientist-vs-public/#comment-5435</link>
		<dc:creator>biochem belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2362#comment-5435</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Odyssey, especially on the greenhouse gas. Do they not watch the news? Ever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Odyssey, especially on the greenhouse gas. Do they not watch the news? Ever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perceptions of Science &#8211; Scientist vs Public by Odyssey</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/perceptions-of-science-scientist-vs-public/#comment-5434</link>
		<dc:creator>Odyssey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2362#comment-5434</guid>
		<description>I found the lack of basic understanding of what stem cells are very disturbing given the strong feeling many people have about them and how much press they&#039;ve had. Ditto for the number of people who couldn&#039;t identify a greenhouse gas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the lack of basic understanding of what stem cells are very disturbing given the strong feeling many people have about them and how much press they&#8217;ve had. Ditto for the number of people who couldn&#8217;t identify a greenhouse gas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perceptions of Science &#8211; Scientist vs Public by D</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/perceptions-of-science-scientist-vs-public/#comment-5433</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2362#comment-5433</guid>
		<description>I think the question that was the most discouraging with only 47% correct was 

Lasers work by focusing sound waves. (T/F)

Everyone plays with laser pointers and has seen laser light shows.  How could they not put two and two together!  They did worse than random chance.

Sigh.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the question that was the most discouraging with only 47% correct was </p>
<p>Lasers work by focusing sound waves. (T/F)</p>
<p>Everyone plays with laser pointers and has seen laser light shows.  How could they not put two and two together!  They did worse than random chance.</p>
<p>Sigh&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perceptions of Science &#8211; Scientist vs Public by D</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/perceptions-of-science-scientist-vs-public/#comment-5432</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2362#comment-5432</guid>
		<description>Woo hoo.  12/12 correct.  Top 10%!  On the other hand it was a pretty easy test.  I feel like the smartest cow in the herd.  Moooo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woo hoo.  12/12 correct.  Top 10%!  On the other hand it was a pretty easy test.  I feel like the smartest cow in the herd.  Moooo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So, with the new scoring procedure, is an 80 good news? by D</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/so-with-the-new-scoring-procedure-is-an-80-good-news/#comment-5430</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2248#comment-5430</guid>
		<description>Great info.  I am sure Program is just as confused about what these new scores mean as anyone.  They&#039;ll have to wait and see what the Budget and Grants Management folks say.  (That is how many they can fund in total)  They probably want to percentile because of the wide variation in absolute scores between study sections.  A 20 could be the best scoring great app in one study section and number 10 in another.  It would not be fair to pick a score cut off in that case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info.  I am sure Program is just as confused about what these new scores mean as anyone.  They&#8217;ll have to wait and see what the Budget and Grants Management folks say.  (That is how many they can fund in total)  They probably want to percentile because of the wide variation in absolute scores between study sections.  A 20 could be the best scoring great app in one study section and number 10 in another.  It would not be fair to pick a score cut off in that case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So, with the new scoring procedure, is an 80 good news? by Redfield</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/so-with-the-new-scoring-procedure-is-an-80-good-news/#comment-5429</link>
		<dc:creator>Redfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2248#comment-5429</guid>
		<description>I also got a score of 20 on my R21.  I spoke to my PO thinking that this was going to be a shoe-in.  He agreed it was a good score but he was very non-committal.  He mentioned that they may do percentiles for R21s and decided on that basis as opposed to a fixed score as it used to be in the old system.  Has anyone else heard about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also got a score of 20 on my R21.  I spoke to my PO thinking that this was going to be a shoe-in.  He agreed it was a good score but he was very non-committal.  He mentioned that they may do percentiles for R21s and decided on that basis as opposed to a fixed score as it used to be in the old system.  Has anyone else heard about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So, with the new scoring procedure, is an 80 good news? by Davis</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/so-with-the-new-scoring-procedure-is-an-80-good-news/#comment-5428</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2248#comment-5428</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on a K01 submission (NIAID) with an impact score of 29?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on a K01 submission (NIAID) with an impact score of 29?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So, with the new scoring procedure, is an 80 good news? by D</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/so-with-the-new-scoring-procedure-is-an-80-good-news/#comment-5427</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2248#comment-5427</guid>
		<description>Percentile?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Percentile?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
