<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Medical Writing, Editing &amp; Grantsmanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writedit.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Customized Customer Support for Biomedical Researchers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by D</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7188</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7188</guid>
		<description>Minimum of 30 days.  Check here.  http://www.csr.nih.gov/Committees/rosterindex.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minimum of 30 days.  Check here.  <a href="http://www.csr.nih.gov/Committees/rosterindex.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.csr.nih.gov/Committees/rosterindex.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by Svetty</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7187</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Can anyone advise as to the number of days before review that the NIH generally provides a list of the review panel by ?

Tks and Happy New Year to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Can anyone advise as to the number of days before review that the NIH generally provides a list of the review panel by ?</p>
<p>Tks and Happy New Year to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by whimple</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7186</link>
		<dc:creator>whimple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7186</guid>
		<description>C. George, there&#039;s nothing to interpret with your examples.  These 1st percentile grants are are perfect by definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C. George, there&#8217;s nothing to interpret with your examples.  These 1st percentile grants are are perfect by definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by Waiting</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>Waiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>Skull, earlier this month my K99 for NHLBI status changed from &quot;Council Review Completed&quot; to &quot;Pending&quot;. The next day NHLBI released the payline, which I was under. The day after that my PO sent me a somewhat vague message saying &quot;we expect to fund your grant, but this is not a NGA&quot;, or something along that line. I have YET to receive a JIT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skull, earlier this month my K99 for NHLBI status changed from &#8220;Council Review Completed&#8221; to &#8220;Pending&#8221;. The next day NHLBI released the payline, which I was under. The day after that my PO sent me a somewhat vague message saying &#8220;we expect to fund your grant, but this is not a NGA&#8221;, or something along that line. I have YET to receive a JIT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by md</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7184</link>
		<dc:creator>md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7184</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that is true, I have GMS assigned to almost all my applications even one with 54 impact score and multiple ones that are pending review.

Does anybody know when we should expect to see R21 paylines announced by NIAID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that is true, I have GMS assigned to almost all my applications even one with 54 impact score and multiple ones that are pending review.</p>
<p>Does anybody know when we should expect to see R21 paylines announced by NIAID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by curiousgeorge</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7183</link>
		<dc:creator>curiousgeorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7183</guid>
		<description>Is this true that having assigned with a Grants Management Specialist means a high likelihood of funding?

C. George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this true that having assigned with a Grants Management Specialist means a high likelihood of funding?</p>
<p>C. George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That vs Which by deserere</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/that-vs-which/#comment-7176</link>
		<dc:creator>deserere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/that-vs-which/#comment-7176</guid>
		<description>hmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by Skull</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7175</link>
		<dc:creator>Skull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7175</guid>
		<description>I have an 18 on a K01 and also have no JIT but have a grants management specialist added and the award status changed from council completed to pending.  Though my PO told me to be optimistic and to not resubmit I still have not received a JIT. . . I think this might be common</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an 18 on a K01 and also have no JIT but have a grants management specialist added and the award status changed from council completed to pending.  Though my PO told me to be optimistic and to not resubmit I still have not received a JIT. . . I think this might be common</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NIH Paylines &amp; Resources by curiousgeorge</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7174</link>
		<dc:creator>curiousgeorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/nih-paylines-resources/#comment-7174</guid>
		<description>Writedit, thank you for these examples of messages from the scientific review.  I saw few R01 examples from NIAID for which I am posting the resume and summary below (from 2008 based on old scoring system). Could you share/decode what you see in these?  Also, are the adjectives such as &quot;outstanding&quot;, &quot;generates high enthusiasm&quot;, etc. are commonly used in summary statement or used only in the top ranking group of applications or reserved only for the absolute best?  Would presence or absence of such adjectives in my resume mean anything?.

C. George

Example 1 (118, 1.1 perc): This outstanding and well-written application proposes to delineate mechanisms by which Entamoeba histolytica recognizes and induces phagocytosis of colonic bacteria and host cells. The knowledge of the events which initiate phagocytosis by invasive E. histolytica will be of high impact in understanding the pathogenesis of this parasite. In response to the prior critiques, the revised application is greatly improved and generates excitement by adding a new aim and additional experiments such as transcriptional gene silencing and development of ominantnegative mutant. There are numerous strengths and no weaknesses have been noted. Novel hypothesis, well-developed research plan, innovative techniques, outstanding investigator and collaborators, impressive publications and strong and convincing preliminary data which support the feasibility of the proposed studies garner high enthusiasm for this application. There is high confidence in the success of the proposed studies.

Example 2 (114, .3 perc): This exciting application proposes to continue structural studies on the conformational changes that occur during maturation of flavivurses from immature particles to mature particles and on the changes that occur during fusion with the cell membrane.  Flaviviruses are important human pathogens, and theses studies will provide important information that could lead to new antiviral and vaccine strategies. The Principal Investigator and his collaborators are at the forefront of structural virology, and the sophisticated approaches being developed will be applicable to other systems as well. The combination of sophisticated structural methods, mutant viruses, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, and particles bound to receptor molecules promises to yield important insights. Overall enthusiasm is extremely high for this project to investigate important structural transformations that occur during the flavivirus life cycle.

Example 3 (115, 0.9 perc): This application seeks to test the hypothesis that targets of the Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopU1, a mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (ADP-RT), will be components of innate immunity. These studies should bring new insight into suppression of plant innate immune responses and RNA regulation in innate immunity and is highly significant work. This revised application has been improved over the previous submission. The impact of this project and experimental progress of this talented and productive investigator are documented by the recent publication of his preliminary data in Nature. The aims of this project are exciting, focused and well thought out. There is particular enthusiasm for Aim 1, to determine the consequence of ADPribosylation on the function of the RNA-binding protein AtGRP7, which was described as “the most interesting aim and should remain a top priority”. Overall, this application generates the highest levels of enthusiasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writedit, thank you for these examples of messages from the scientific review.  I saw few R01 examples from NIAID for which I am posting the resume and summary below (from 2008 based on old scoring system). Could you share/decode what you see in these?  Also, are the adjectives such as &#8220;outstanding&#8221;, &#8220;generates high enthusiasm&#8221;, etc. are commonly used in summary statement or used only in the top ranking group of applications or reserved only for the absolute best?  Would presence or absence of such adjectives in my resume mean anything?.</p>
<p>C. George</p>
<p>Example 1 (118, 1.1 perc): This outstanding and well-written application proposes to delineate mechanisms by which Entamoeba histolytica recognizes and induces phagocytosis of colonic bacteria and host cells. The knowledge of the events which initiate phagocytosis by invasive E. histolytica will be of high impact in understanding the pathogenesis of this parasite. In response to the prior critiques, the revised application is greatly improved and generates excitement by adding a new aim and additional experiments such as transcriptional gene silencing and development of ominantnegative mutant. There are numerous strengths and no weaknesses have been noted. Novel hypothesis, well-developed research plan, innovative techniques, outstanding investigator and collaborators, impressive publications and strong and convincing preliminary data which support the feasibility of the proposed studies garner high enthusiasm for this application. There is high confidence in the success of the proposed studies.</p>
<p>Example 2 (114, .3 perc): This exciting application proposes to continue structural studies on the conformational changes that occur during maturation of flavivurses from immature particles to mature particles and on the changes that occur during fusion with the cell membrane.  Flaviviruses are important human pathogens, and theses studies will provide important information that could lead to new antiviral and vaccine strategies. The Principal Investigator and his collaborators are at the forefront of structural virology, and the sophisticated approaches being developed will be applicable to other systems as well. The combination of sophisticated structural methods, mutant viruses, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, and particles bound to receptor molecules promises to yield important insights. Overall enthusiasm is extremely high for this project to investigate important structural transformations that occur during the flavivirus life cycle.</p>
<p>Example 3 (115, 0.9 perc): This application seeks to test the hypothesis that targets of the Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopU1, a mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase (ADP-RT), will be components of innate immunity. These studies should bring new insight into suppression of plant innate immune responses and RNA regulation in innate immunity and is highly significant work. This revised application has been improved over the previous submission. The impact of this project and experimental progress of this talented and productive investigator are documented by the recent publication of his preliminary data in Nature. The aims of this project are exciting, focused and well thought out. There is particular enthusiasm for Aim 1, to determine the consequence of ADPribosylation on the function of the RNA-binding protein AtGRP7, which was described as “the most interesting aim and should remain a top priority”. Overall, this application generates the highest levels of enthusiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ResearchMatch.org by Reflections on November 2009 &#171; The Amazing World of Psychiatry: A Psychiatry Blog</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/researchmatch-org/#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflections on November 2009 &#171; The Amazing World of Psychiatry: A Psychiatry Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=2729#comment-7173</guid>
		<description>[...] coverage of a recent workshop on the future of the semantic web for scientific communication. In this article there is a look at an organisation which matches researchers with research [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage of a recent workshop on the future of the semantic web for scientific communication. In this article there is a look at an organisation which matches researchers with research [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
