<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journal Peer Review Cont&#8217;d &#8211; and Retracted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writedit.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/journal-peer-review-contd-and-retracted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/journal-peer-review-contd-and-retracted/</link>
	<description>Customized Customer Support for Biomedical Researchers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: writedit</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/journal-peer-review-contd-and-retracted/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator>writedit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=424#comment-3795</guid>
		<description>And a bit more on the Science &quot;Expression of Concern&quot;, which is about to advance to full retraction of papers from both Science and Nature Chemical Biology. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/319/5869/1468&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scientific Misconduct News of the Week&lt;/a&gt; describes the South Korean investigation leading to the conclusion that the two papers &quot;do not contain any scientific truth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a bit more on the Science &#8220;Expression of Concern&#8221;, which is about to advance to full retraction of papers from both Science and Nature Chemical Biology. The <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/319/5869/1468" rel="nofollow">Scientific Misconduct News of the Week</a> describes the South Korean investigation leading to the conclusion that the two papers &#8220;do not contain any scientific truth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrugMonkey</title>
		<link>http://writedit.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/journal-peer-review-contd-and-retracted/#comment-3791</link>
		<dc:creator>DrugMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writedit.wordpress.com/?p=424#comment-3791</guid>
		<description>It is really going to be interesting to see an update on the retraction data in a couple of years. It could be just through writedit&#039;s efforts that bring these to my attention but is sure seems like there has been a sea change in dealing with fakery...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really going to be interesting to see an update on the retraction data in a couple of years. It could be just through writedit&#8217;s efforts that bring these to my attention but is sure seems like there has been a sea change in dealing with fakery&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
